The Backwash

If you won't drink it, then read it.

A Restoration Movement too far?

Most of us that have grown up in a protestant background have learned our history of the restoration / reformation movement.  Both were very necessary.  As I mentioned yesterday, the heirarchical clergy-driven all-roads-lead-to-Rome model is completely out of whack – missing the missional aspect of Christianity.

However, like a pendulum, we as humans tend to take things too far.  I wish I had a penny for every time I have heard the phrase “we want to be like the first century church.”  I’d be rich and paying-off church buildings left and right.  While the premise is fine, the practice has typically gone to the extreme.  In my more haughty moments, I have usually come back with “which first century church do you want to be like?  Corinth?  Pergamum?” 

Here’s the deal.  If our goal of “being like the first century church” is to be missional, seek God’s guidance, and communicate the gospel in its simplicity, count me in.  My fear is that, like everything else humans do, we take it too far.  Consider some convicting quotes below:

“The (missional church) will be radical in its attempts to embrace biblical mandates for the life of locally based faith communities without feeling as though it has to reconstruct the first-century church in every detail.”  Frost & Hirsch – The Shaping of Things to Come

“I believe church must change.  The church is not trend-driven; it is God’s family and lives by other rules.  But it is also a cultural and social institution, rooted in a given place and time.  If we have any concern for the rising generations – and for those who will follow them – we must look with urgency to the future to shape our church.”  Gerard Kelly – RetroFuture

And perhaps, most telling…

“Every denomination and religious organization I have worked with does long-range planning.  Ironically, they do long-range planning as though the future will simply be an extension of the present…As a result, we are chronically surprised by change.  In the future, we can no longer afford this luxury.”  Tom Sine – Wild Hope

Been there?  Done that?  Have you been involved with a church that does long-range planning only assuming those things we have seen to-date?  Assuming that every year will be an extension of the past year?  Is it any wonder some of our congregations simply bumble along, relishing in the baptism numbers that are primarily reflective of the members kids getting baptized?  Is it any surprise that most of our urban churches tout thier growth numbers that, if all is really told, are driven 80%-90% by christians moving from one congregation to the next?

The danger I see in many churches is that most gravitate to the focus of being like the first century church, and spend every day wishing tomorrow will be yesterday.  This is dangerous ground – and most importantly, it is not a missional mindset (even though the first century church was extremely missional).  Holding to that notion too strongly assumes the first-century church was perfection.  In fact, most who hold to this line of thought assume that there was the first century church, and we have spent every day since then trying to get back to what it was.  Well, here’s the news flash… it wasn’t perfect.  In fact, it was filled with lawsuits, incest, false teachers, apathy, and arguments – and those are only a few of the problems that scripture actually mentions.

Where is the healthy medium?  Personally, I feel that we must chase after the first century church’s sense of community and pursuit of a holy lifestyle and Christ-centeredness.  Outside of that, I think we have a lot of latitude to adapt to culture in an attempt to be missional – and to get the unchanging truth to an always-changing world. 

The final downside of too much “we have to be like the first century church” thinking is that we simply cannot change – which is about as non-biblical a concept as there could be.  The reality is that we are called to be the incarnation of Christ in a 21st century world.  The message has not changed – but the methods must.  If not, we will continue our “Field of Dreams” mentality; and we will continue to assume that those who stay in the world have made a conscious decision to do so until they happen to stumble into one of our buildings at the next appointed time.  Maybe the real first century concept we need to harness is the fact that Jesus began the great commission with the word “Go.” 

At this point, the people of the 21st century in America are very accustomed to driving past hundreds of church buildings without giving much notice.  It is only when they experience Christ from one of us that they will really “see” the church.

 

-MH

November 27, 2007 - 7:47 AM Comments (3)

Brain-Dead thoughts

Nothing really introspective today – still on re-entry from the holidays.  However, I did finish the book “ World Without End ” by Ken Follett.  Some of you may have read his earlier “blockbuster” called “The Pillars of the Earth.”  This was a different read for me.  I branched out and must say that for 1,014 pages, I kept coming back to find out what happened.  The lame part of the book was Follett’s apparent obsession with descriptions of graphic sex.  If you took those 200 pages out, the book would still have been good.  Apparently Follett thought that in the middle-ages, that is all everyone could think about.  I would have thought they would be more concerned with things like how to avoid the Plague or something like that.

The most interesting thing to me was the showcasing of how screwed-up the approach of cathedrals, abbots, bishops, priors, etc. etc. really were.  Talk about missing the entire point of the gospel.  When it gets down to it, Follett paints the heirarchical approach to church as interested in nothing more than political power plays and money.  Interesting.   At any rate, I would recommend it were it not for that one falldown mentioned above.  But, hey, I branced out.  I read a book about the middle ages written by a Brit and didn’t die of boredom in the process.  Woo Hoo!

-MH

November 26, 2007 - 3:27 PM No Comments

GPS for the Soul

I have made my first foray into the GPS market.  I got tired of juggling Avis maps while throwing change at toll booths in cities I’m not familiar with.  What is odd is that just yesterday in Orlando, I caught myself actually saying what the dude in the Garmin commercial says to his GPS… “I love you.” 

For a man, this is a great tool.  It is wired in our DNA to not ask for directions, but how perfect to marry one of our weaknesses in a package for which we have such a weakness….an electronic toy…with a touchscreen no less!

I have found, though, that I pay little attention to the detail around me just waiting for the gender-neutral voice to blurt-out “turn right in point-seven miles.”  With a map, you actually had to try and pay attention.  Wouldn’t it be nice if we had a spiritual GPS unit for our lives?  “Take communion in one-half minute.”  “Don’t lie in three-hours.”  “Potential lust at three-o-clock, turn away.” 

Sometimes there is a sheer comfort in being told what to do, and feeling like you have accomplished something when you do it.  Of course, it is at that point as a person of God that we lose any semblance of exercising free will, or of putting any heart into what we are doing.  Maybe this is the thinking that turned “decent and in order” into “boring and predictable” or “repetitious and lifeless.”  I certainly don’t want to pick on worship as there are a lot of aspects of our life that are affected when we turn on the spiritual GPS.  But honestly… we could fall asleep in a worship service in Little Rock and wake-up in a service in Arizona and still know when to stand, sit, take communion and say “amen.”

Yes, without even knowing it, I may have slipped into using one of these little spiritual GPS units.  Telltale signs are:  boredom, lack of patience with other people or ideas, and lack of involvement in anything other than public gatherings.  I for one want to recapture the heart of my faith, and maybe that is why I still get a little misty everytime I am in an assembly where the song “My Eyes are Dry” is sung (because it hits me between the eyes).  The writer didn’t know it, but they wrote the song in anticipation of many of us relying on our spiritual GPS units. 

 

-MH

November 15, 2007 - 7:07 PM No Comments

Are we ready to quit playing church?

So much about my church life has been about the checklist.  Being at the right service, in the right class, going on the right youth trip and giving the right amount of money, among other things, were all part of my church life.  Even though we didn’t see the church building as holy in and of itself, we still treated it that way.  Certain jokes were not told in there, and as a child we certainly could not run in the building.

I am coming to grips that our attempt to “do” church has been very much a reflection of the modern culture in which our parents and their parents grew-up.  The challenge we have is that, in an post-modern culture, the church is not resonating as it did in the modern culture – if it ever did.  Our scientific approach to systematize everything the church did hurt, in my estimation, the impact we could have had. 

Rather than put a lot of my thoughts into print just yet, I want to share a quote from one of my current reads (and yes, for those who are part of the go to conference and seminar crowds, you realize I’m about two years late reading this book).  If you have not read it yet, you simply MUST buy this book and devour it – especially if you are interested in being part of the church having a broader impact on society as a whole.

The book is “The Shaping of Things to Come” by Michael Frost and Alan Hirsch (see below).

Cover Image

The following quote, taken from the first chapter called “Evolution or Revolution” puts a lot in perspective for me:  “The missional church disassembles itself and seeps into the cracks and crevices of a society in order to be Christ to those who don’t yet know him.” 

These guys have done an exceptional study of the church as it relates to pre modernity, modernity and post modernity.  The reason the quote above strikes me is that it is so biblical.  If the church is to truly make a difference in the world, we must abandon the Field of Dreams mentality we have taken of building bigger buildings and saving whoever happens to come in the door and knows they need to walk down front and check “be baptized” in the response box. 

I applaud many of our congregations for making steps in this direction.  Some of the ways we have seen this happening is with inner city ministries that get involved in the lives of people (rather than just “planting” a church that commutes in for a white worship service and then commutes back out to the suburbs).  We are also seeing situations where more and more congregations are trying to get involved in real-life problems such as debt management, and other things that hit people where they live. 

When it comes down to it, if we really follow our leader, we’re not going end up in a church pew as the totality of our Christian walk.  In fact, that will likely be the place where we serve him the least.

-MH

November 6, 2007 - 1:32 PM Comments (4)

Just finished on 11.2.07

I AM A BIG FAN OF VINCE FLYNN!  This guy is approaching “early Clancy” goodness.  Read ‘em all, you will be pleased.  Yes, the protagonist simply cannot die, but any series is going to have that person live on despite immeasurable odds.  I read this jewel in two days.  Now I have to wait for his next one.

Cover Image
November 4, 2007 - 7:25 PM No Comments

So, What’s the Point?

Airplanes again.  This time, NYC (I do love me some NYC). 

The FAA mandates that flight attendants verify everyone sitting in an exit row is “able and willing” to open the exit in the event of an emergency.  If you are like me, you have been on some flights where nobody is sitting in an exit row, or an exit row on one side of the plane is left unattended.  (I personally love the exit row…More leg room than first class and the seats in front of you cannot fully recline.  This is good because some of those old people with greasy heads can’t recline and put the smelly crown of their lid in your face).

At any rate, what is the point of asking?  One would suppose that in the event of an emergency, if nobody is seated in the exit row, then nobody on the plane is willing and therefore we cannot use the exits.  I guess there are some who cannot form the word EXIT out of the four letters over the removable piece of the fuselage, and they have to be given an option to opt-out.  Could this be just another way the FAA has created yet another stupid rule to absolve airlines of litigation? 

Here are some suggestions for additional exit row criteria:

  • The current age rule is good.  No problems there.  But maybe there should be a cap on age.  “If you are entering the drooling years and think you might sleep through an emergency, you can’t sit here).
  • How about “if you require the use of a seat belt extender, you CANNOT sit in an exit row.”  I mean, honestly, what is the point of having someone who is willing but blocks the exit?  (Don’t be offended – you have thought the same thing).
  • If you think you might try to take your laptop with you in the event of an emergency, you can’t sit here.
  • If you are going to consume alcohol, you can’t sit here.

Just a few suggestions. 

 

-MH

November 2, 2007 - 1:48 PM Comments (2)